[Gvsig_english] Error - Geoprocessing tools

Lucie Prunarová lprunarova at gmail.com
Fri Dec 16 12:30:52 CET 2011


Hi,
unfortunatelly I don't have grass and I don't know which tools it has to
control the topology. Is there something in gvSIG what I can use for the
control? Or sextante? Or can you please check the data for me? It's weard
that the tools work sometimes and sometimes not. If the data would be bad,
I thing that the error should be there everytime.

Lucie

2011/12/16 Adi Fajar RAMLY <framly at gmail.com>

>
> Hi,
>
> I think, your data topologically is not perfect. Use the GRASS Tools to
> check your data.
>
> Regards,
>
> Adi
>  On 16 Dec 2011 17:58, "Lucie Prunarová" <lprunarova at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I have problem with geoprocessing tools. I use shp polygon data with
>> projection ESRI:102067. When I try to apply geoprocessing tools on it,
>> there are several errors depending on the tool. Buffer tool is OK.
>>
>> When try difference or intersection (concretely layers buf_kom, chodniky)
>> two things happened. Sometimes there is bad result (the result layer is the
>> same like the input layer buf_kom, or the result is empty layer). The
>> second thing is attached error.
>>
>> When try union of two layers (concretely chodniky, zelen_plochy)
>> sometimes it works, sometimes there is this error:
>> com.vividsolutions.jts.geom.TopologyException: found non-noded
>> intersection between LINESTRING ( -34.40000000002328 13.78000000002794,
>> -25.180000000051223 14.520000000018626 ) and LINESTRING (
>> -25.229999999981374 14.930000000051223, -24.849999999976717 7.75 ) [
>> (-25.208181128967457, 14.517738174053571, NaN) ]
>>
>>     com.vividsolutions.jts.noding.FastNodingValidator.checkValid(FastNodingValidator.java:109)
>>
>>     com.vividsolutions.jts.geomgraph.EdgeNodingValidator.checkValid(EdgeNodingValidator.java:94)
>>
>>     com.vividsolutions.jts.geomgraph.EdgeNodingValidator.checkValid(EdgeNodingValidator.java:59)
>>
>>     com.vividsolutions.jts.operation.overlay.OverlayOp.computeOverlay(OverlayOp.java:170)
>>
>>     com.vividsolutions.jts.operation.overlay.OverlayOp.getResultGeometry(OverlayOp.java:127)
>>
>>     com.vividsolutions.jts.operation.overlay.OverlayOp.overlayOp(OverlayOp.java:66)
>>
>>     com.vividsolutions.jts.operation.overlay.snap.SnapOverlayOp.getResultGeometry(SnapOverlayOp.java:68)
>>
>>     com.vividsolutions.jts.operation.overlay.snap.SnapOverlayOp.overlayOp(SnapOverlayOp.java:25)
>>
>>     com.vividsolutions.jts.operation.overlay.snap.SnapIfNeededOverlayOp.getResultGeometry(SnapIfNeededOverlayOp.java:76)
>>
>>     com.vividsolutions.jts.operation.overlay.snap.SnapIfNeededOverlayOp.overlayOp(SnapIfNeededOverlayOp.java:25)
>>     com.vividsolutions.jts.geom.Geometry.intersection(Geometry.java:1117)
>>
>>     com.vividsolutions.jts.precision.EnhancedPrecisionOp.intersection(EnhancedPrecisionOp.java:57)
>>
>>     com.iver.cit.gvsig.geoprocess.core.util.JTSFacade.intersection(JTSFacade.java:114)
>>
>>     com.iver.cit.gvsig.geoprocess.impl.intersection.fmap.IntersectVisitor$1.visit(IntersectVisitor.java:239)
>>
>>     com.iver.cit.gvsig.fmap.operations.strategies.DBStrategy.process(DBStrategy.java:264)
>>
>>     com.iver.cit.gvsig.fmap.operations.strategies.DefaultStrategy.process(DefaultStrategy.java:312)
>>
>>     com.iver.cit.gvsig.geoprocess.impl.intersection.fmap.IntersectVisitor.visit(IntersectVisitor.java:211)
>>
>>     com.iver.cit.gvsig.fmap.operations.strategies.DefaultStrategy.process(DefaultStrategy.java:398)
>>
>>     com.iver.cit.gvsig.geoprocess.impl.union.fmap.UnionGeoprocess$UnionMonitorableTask.run(UnionGeoprocess.java:378)
>>
>>     com.iver.utiles.swing.threads.MonitorableDecoratorMainFirst.run(MonitorableDecoratorMainFirst.java:155)
>>     com.iver.andami.PluginServices$1.construct(PluginServices.java:405)
>>     com.iver.utiles.swing.threads.SwingWorker$2.run(SwingWorker.java:108)
>>     java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
>>
>> I tried to work with these layers in gvSIG 1.11 (Windows 7) and gvSIG
>> 1.10 (Windows XP), the result is very unstable and these errors are in both
>> of these versions and operating systems.
>>
>> Can anybody help me?
>> I also attach the data. Maybe the error is in them. Is there some
>> possibility in gvSIG to control topology of the data before applying tools?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Lucie
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gvsig_internacional mailing list
>> Gvsig_internacional at listserv.gva.es
>>
>> To see the archives, edit your preferences or unsubscribe from this
>> mailing list, please access this url:
>>
>> http://listserv.gva.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gvsig_internacional
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Gvsig_internacional mailing list
> Gvsig_internacional at listserv.gva.es
>
> To see the archives, edit your preferences or unsubscribe from this
> mailing list, please access this url:
>
> http://listserv.gva.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gvsig_internacional
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://listserv.gva.es/pipermail/gvsig_internacional/attachments/20111216/48542433/attachment.htm 


More information about the Gvsig_internacional mailing list