<html><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div>I Mija,</div><div><br></div>So, if I understand correctly, by choosing java instead of Qt, developpers take a dead end for portability. Also, if it's take ressource the poject doesn't have that mean not expect mac support in the future? <div><br></div><div>Just be clear about it please. If it will be available on stable release it's ok. If mac support is drop, said so. Others gis java base, less promising thant gv_sig have not these problem so we have to look elsewere.</div><div><br></div><div>Marcel<br><div><div>Le 09-11-26 à 11:19, Jorge Gaspar Sanz Salinas a écrit :</div><blockquote type="cite"><div><blockquote type="cite"><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#000000"><br></font></blockquote><br>Mija,<br><br>I don't want to start a flame about Mac. I don't have the technical<br>knowledge to answer in detail any Mac related question, but you know<br>perfectlly that the deployment of gvSIG in Mac has some difficulties<br>that are not present at Linux or Windows.<br><br>Let me correct myself, reorienting my thoughts "Doing Java apps with<br>JNI bridges to native libraries is a PITA in every environment, and<br>gvSIG doesn't have enough resources to cover MacOS, Windows Vista/7 or<br>Solaris at this time, but collaboration is always welcomed"<br><br></div></blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>