[Gvsig_english] question about gvSIG's union function

[Cristina Bedoya]

Hi Wolfgang, Marcus,

This bug has been unable to reproduce.

We added two layers of polygon geometry, then has been made "union" 
geoprocessing and the result is expected, the fields of the union-layer 
are correctly (appears the fields of the entry layer in the first 
position and the fields of de union layer after).

The operation was conducted with layers of more than 900 records, and 
conducting a selection of a zone of the layers.

We need more information to reproduce the possible error. As know that 
number of records have layers you use, if you do any selection in layers 
to merge or any other data necessary to reproduce this error.

Thank you,

Cris




Marcus C. England wrote:
> Hi Wolfgang,
>
> I have the same problem, but I remember someone mentioning that on here
> once and I thought someone from the gvSIG team noted that it was known
> bug.
>
> -Marcus
>
> On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 15:42 +0200, Wolfgang Qual wrote:
>   
>> Hi list,
>> when trying to use the "union"-function of gvSIG's geoprocessing toolbox, I noticed that the result was not what I expected. Instead of creating a new theme, which contains all (geometry-)information of both themes, a new theme is generated that only contains the geometry of one input theme. I made several test, but everytime the same result. Now, I would like to ask you about your experiences with that tool - is it working for you? I am using gvSIG version 1.1.2 on a linux machine. 
>>
>> Best,
>> Wolfgang
>>     
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gvsig_internacional mailing list
> Gvsig_internacional at runas.cap.gva.es
> http://runas.cap.gva.es/mailman/listinfo/gvsig_internacional
>
>
>   


-- 
Cristina Bedoya Pellicé
Proyecto gvSIG
Conselleria de Infraestructuras y Transportes (GVA).
Valencia (Spain)