[Gvsig_english] New Student for GVSIG within Google Summer OfCode2010: quick introduction

Benjamin Ducke benjamin.ducke at oxfordarch.co.uk
Mon May 17 13:55:59 CEST 2010


Cesar,

excellent point. SpatiaLite's indexing is maybe it's most important
advantage for our use.

But I think we all agree that it would make sense for Luca to first
do the simple WKB/WKT storage model and then start working on the
SpatiaLite support? Depending on time, as you say, he may or may not
be able to finish it within this year's GSoC.

Cheers,

Ben

----- Original Message -----
From: "Cèsar Ordiñana" <cordinyana at gvsig.com>
To: "Users and Developers mailing list" <gvsig_internacional at listserv.gva.es>
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 1:51:56 PM GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Bern / Rome / Stockholm / Vienna
Subject: Re: [Gvsig_english] New Student for GVSIG within Google Summer OfCode2010: quick introduction


Hi Ben, 

Benjamin Ducke escribió: 

Hi Juan Lucas 

As for Luca's project, I think JNI (on top of OGR or
SQLite/Spatialite) is unavoidable, no? OpenJUMP's plugin might be a
reference, as somebody said. They are using a JAR that includes a
native library (.dll, .so) in it: https://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/jump-pilot/index.php?title=OpenJUMP_with_SpatialLite Thanks for the link. There will certainly be interesting information
in there.

If we go for the simple WKB/WKT storage model, then Luca could model
his work on the existing code for the PostGIS driver and avoid having
to use JNI, at least until support for the native SpatiaLite format
is required (but then that can still be done via the existing 
GDAL/OGR driver bindings). 
I agree the simple model may be interesting, as a way to be able to work with existing sqlite databases or even as a first phase of development. 

That work should be quite quick and easy, as there is a base implementation for JDBC based DAL providers, and our current Postgis and Mysql providers are already reading and writing geometries in WKB format by themselves, so they are good examples to start from. 

But I think we shall go to the full spatialite support. gvSIG needs support for a local personal database, for many uses (cache, temporal storage, etc.), and we still haven't one because the java based ones (HSQLDB, etc.) doesn't have proper spatial support. With spatial support I mean, above all, spatial indexes support, or I fear performance will suffer badly. 

I don't know if that work is too much to be done in the period available for Luca in the GsC, and should be continued in the next year's GsC, or by some other volunteer/s, but I would like to stress the importance of having spatialite support, at least at spatial indexes level. 

Regards, 
-- 
Cèsar Ordiñana Navarro
gvSIG software architect
DiSiD Technologies ( http://www.disid.com ) 



Cheers,

Ben 

Nacho's work sounds very interesting too.

Regards,


Juan Lucas Domínguez Rubio
---
Prodevelop SL, Valencia (España)

Tlf.: 96.351.06.12 -- Fax: 96.351.09.68 http://www.prodevelop.es ---


De: gvsig_internacional-bounces at listserv.gva.es en nombre de Benjamin
Ducke
Enviado el: lun 17/05/2010 9:28
Para: Users and Developers mailing list
Asunto: Re: [Gvsig_english] New Student for GVSIG within Google Summer
OfCode2010: quick introduction 

Ben,

you know for sure much better than me what would mean having problems 

with wrapping of C API so if we will have too much pain with
SpatiaLite it could be perfect use the plain WKT/WKB. I've given a
glance to the link you've suggested but I should read it better for
understanding what it means on the development point of view.

Ciao,
Luca I think for a first stage implementation, the simple WKB/WKT
storage model is probably best. Others can always be added later
using the new GDAL 1.7 java bindings. That way, you shouldn't
have to worry about maintaining your own JNI stuff (which can
be a real pain).

Give users the choice to use WKB (more compact) or WKT (more
easy to parse) when storing geometries. When reading, the
format should be auto-detected.

Let me know if you have any problems understanding anything.
I can send you a little sample SQLite3 database with some WKB/WKT
tables for illustration. I produced them in GRASS GIS using the
GDAL/OGR drivers.

But maybe start by adding plain SQLite3 non-spatial tables as
a new project document type first. And then work towards spatial
tables from there -- to keep things a little more simple for you
at the start!

Best,

Ben 

[1] http://www.iosa.it/blogs/luca 2010/5/14 Benjamin Ducke <benjamin.ducke at oxfordarch.co.uk> Hi Juan, Luca

That question is not so rhetorical, actually!
There are several ways of storing spatial data in an SQLite3
database, that are all in use by some software: http://www.gdal.org/ogr/drv_sqlite.html One of them is a simple WKT/WKB storage model that is also nicely
documented (see link above).

So if SpatiaLite is too much pain, because of the need to wrap the
C API, then we can just use the plain WKT/WKB storage for our
purposes.
It's supported by GDAL/OGR, so we lose only the special SpatiaLite
functionality.

Cheers,

Ben

----- Original Message -----
From: "Juan Lucas Dominguez Rubio" <jldominguez at prodevelop.es> To: "Users and Developers mailing list" <gvsig_internacional at listserv.gva.es> , "Gvsig internacional" <Gvsig_internacional at listserv.gva.es> Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 2:38:44 PM GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / 

Bern / Rome / Stockholm / Vienna
Subject: Re: [Gvsig_english] New Student for GVSIG within Google
Summer Of Code2010: quick introduction




Ciao, Luca.

I too think Spatialite is a very interesting way to store and share
GIS data, especially because its simplicity fits mobile devices very
well.

I know a pure-Java version of SQLite (not Spatialite) which will
probably work on a wide range of Java-enabled mobile devices (Android 

supports SQlite too).

I was wondering: what is the simplest Sqlite database that can be read 

and processed from Spatialite? Let's suppose I have a Sqlite database 

file with only one table and one of the columns of that table is of
binary type (BLOB or similar), and that column contains some WKB
describing a geometry. Would this be enough to open it from a
Spatialite-enabled application (for example gvSIG in the future)? This 

is rather a rhetorical question... I need to look into it myself :)

Can we see your progresses online? blog? SVN?

Regards,


Juan Lucas Domínguez Rubio
---
Prodevelop SL, Valencia (España)

Tlf.: 96.351.06.12 -- Fax: 96.351.09.68 http://www.prodevelop.es ---


De: gvsig_internacional-bounces at listserv.gva.es en nombre de luca
bianconi
Enviado el: jue 06/05/2010 15:17
Para: Gvsig_internacional at listserv.gva.es Asunto: [Gvsig_english] New Student for GVSIG within Google Summer Of 

Code2010: quick introduction


Hello gvsig-international mailing list,

sorry for sending this email as a kind of spamming, I'd like just to
introduce myself quickly to the whole list.

My name is Luca Bianconi and I'm the "student" working with the gvSig 

team for the Google Summer of Code 2010.
Our task is implementing the gvSig support for SQlite and SpatiaLite
and I'll do my best for doing it.

I'd like to say my "Hello" to everybody and I thank you all for the
help you will be able to provide when we will be up to the
implementation phase both in comments and suggestions!

Nice to meet you all,
Cheers,
Luca
_______________________________________________ 


_______________________________________________
Gvsig_internacional mailing list
Gvsig_internacional at listserv.gva.es
http://listserv.gva.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gvsig_internacional


------
Files attached to this email may be in ISO 26300 format (OASIS Open Document Format). If you have difficulty opening them, please visit http://iso26300.info for more information.



More information about the Gvsig_internacional mailing list