[Gvsig_english] Problem gvSIG 2.0.0.2066 -- How do I work with Multisurface3D Shapefiles?

[Cèsar Ordiñana]

Hi,

Thanks to the work of Jorge Piera they are really based on the ISO 
19107:2003 [1], which "specifies conceptual schemas for describing the 
spatial characteristics of geographic features".

GML (ISO 19136:2007) [2] is a XML encoding compliant with the previous 
ISO, so geometry types are similar to gvSIG's.

Regards.

[1] 
http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=26012
[2] 
http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=32554

El 06/06/13 17:26, Jordi Torres escribió:
> Hi Fran,
>
> That names are based in the GML specification AFAIK.
>
> Cheers.
>
>
> 2013/6/6 Francisco Puga <fpuga at cartolab.es <mailto:fpuga at cartolab.es>>
>
>     Hi Cesar,
>
>     There is any reason to choose that names, surface and so on, instead
>     the more common denominations?
>
>     2013/6/6 Simon Cropper <simoncropper at fossworkflowguides.com
>     <mailto:simoncropper at fossworkflowguides.com>>:
>     >  > Simon, would you be able to share the shapefile with us so we
>     can try
>     >  > to find what is happening?
>     >
>     > I have I sent them to Joaquin del Cerro
>     >
>     > On 06/06/13 19:43, Cèsar Ordiñana wrote:
>     >> El 06/06/13 10:44, Simon Cropper escribió:
>     >>> Jukka,
>     >>>
>     >>> To be honest nor have I.
>     >>>
>     >>> This is what is reported in the gvSIG layer properties dialog.
>     >>
>     >> Hi,
>     >>
>     >> The MultiSurface3D type is the gvSIG geometry type name, not
>     the Shape
>     >> type name, as it is independent of the data source type.
>     >>
>     >> The relationship between gvSIG geometry types and the shapefile
>     ones is,
>     >> more or less:
>     >>
>     >> - Surface: Polygon
>     >> - Curve: Polyline
>     >> - Point: Point
>     >> - 3D: Z
>     >> - 2D: Nothing
>     >>
>     >> We share the prefix "Multi" and when we add support for
>     geometries with
>     >> "M" it will be added as a suffix also.
>     >>
>     >> So a Shape of Polyline type should become a Curve2D in gvSIG, a
>     Shape of
>     >> PolygonZ type must become a Surface3D, ... In the case of a
>     MultiPatch
>     >> Shape, maybe it would become a MultiSurface2D or
>     MultiSurface3D, but I'm
>     >> not sure if this is being taken into account in the current
>     code. Anyway
>     >> I suppose this is not the case of Simon's shape file, so it
>     seems to me
>     >> there is a bug in the information shown in the layer properties
>     dialog.
>     >>
>     >> Simon, would you be able to share the shapefile with us so we
>     can try to
>     >> find what is happening? If I understood you well, the file is
>     opened in
>     >> gvSIG but the editing and geoprocessing tools don't work with
>     it. Is
>     >> that so?
>     >>
>     >> Regards.
>     >>
>

-- 
Cèsar Ordiñana Navarro
gvSIG software architect
DiSiD Technologies (http://www.disid.com)

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://listserv.gva.es/pipermail/gvsig_internacional/attachments/20130606/561f2d8a/attachment.htm