[Gvsig_english] comparison between gvSIG and another java-based GIS: openjump. Possible?

[Simone Casciaroli]

I have already done this comparison when my firm decided to support an
Open Source Desktop GIS.
gvSIG respect to OpenJump is:
- more stable
- more quick in the loading of shape and at the same time with less
memory requirement
- more OGC complaint (when I tested OpenJump there isn't a WFS plugin)
- the interface is more professional and more similar to professional
GIS/CAD tools
The only con (for me):
- OpenJump has more development documentation, and the international
community is wider

I hope that this contributions can help you

SImone


On 6/12/07, Wolfgang Qual <wolfgang.qual at gmx.net> wrote:
> Hi list,
> I would be interested in your opinion: is it possible to make a fair
> comparison between gvSIG and openjump? Both are java-based applications, both
> have similar extensions, but what's the difference? I have the impression
> that development of gvSIG is very straight-forward, the webpage is very
> transparent. But I do not have any experiences with openjump. Therefore, I
> would be most grateful for some comments. Is there a link/exchange between
> the developers of both applications or are they completely separated?
>
> Best regards,
> Wolfgang
> _______________________________________________
> Gvsig_internacional mailing list
> Gvsig_internacional at runas.cap.gva.es
> http://runas.cap.gva.es/mailman/listinfo/gvsig_internacional
>