[Gvsig_english] gvSIG: issue with georeferecing function of 1.9 (build 1221, 1243)

[Wolfgang Qual]

Hi Benjamin,
which build did you use? The old 1221 was working quite good - 
sometimes. I'll keep my fingers crossed that this bug will be solved soon...

Best,
Wolfgang

Benjamin Ducke schrieb:
> Hi Wolfgang,
>
> I also used to run gvSIG 1.9 on Ubuntu 7.10 and could not load any
> raster formats that were supported by the system libs (e.g.
> TIFF, PNG, Jpeg). I did manage to load an ECW raster. That
> was about it.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ben
>
> roser wrote:
>   
>> Hi wolfgang
>>
>> We're trying to test the georreferencing function, and it's true that 
>> it's giving us some problems, but we've haven't stablished the bug 
>> exactly yet, We're working on it, if you, or anybody else is capable to 
>> stablish the steps to "make it crash" please let us know.
>> And for the ubuntu version I have to tell you that we've tested gvsig 
>> with newer versions and it is giving us problems too. I'm using number 8 
>> or something like that and it works fine, but another tester here is 
>> working with 9 and it is a bit problematic, she is going to come back to 
>> 8, so I think that if number 7.10 works fine it's better not to update 
>> to a newer version, or at least not the newest one, as I've told you, 
>> number 8 works fine
>>
>> Best regards
>> roser
>>
>>
>>
>> Wolfgang Qual wrote:
>>     
>>> Hi,
>>> a colleague of me tries to use the georeferencing function of gvSIG 1.9 
>>> unstable. Currently, she is working on a linux machine (ubuntu 7.10) 
>>> with gvSIG build 1221.
>>> She also tried the newer builds (also the last one 1243), but here, 
>>> loading the image to be georeferenced will produce the error message "It 
>>> is not possible load layer. We can try it by hand."
>>> Using 1221, georeferencing works, but not in all cases (sometimes the 
>>> image is truncated, sometimes the image is located somewhere else, but 
>>> not at the expected location). We discovered that the same image could be
>>> succesfully georeferenced in a new project. But this also did not work 
>>> in every case. Polynominal transformation degree 2 with 6 tic-points 
>>> (control points) was used. Did anybody else discover this issue?
>>> It's very strange that the newer builds of 1.9 are not working correctly 
>>> on that machine. is 7.10 already too old for gvSIG?
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Wolfgang
>>>   
>>>       
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gvsig_internacional mailing list
>> Gvsig_internacional at listserv.gva.es
>> http://listserv.gva.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gvsig_internacional
>>
>>
>>     
>
>
>
> ------
> Files attached to this email may be in ISO 26300 format (OASIS Open Document Format). If you have difficulty opening them, please visit http://iso26300.info for more information.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gvsig_internacional mailing list
> Gvsig_internacional at listserv.gva.es
> http://listserv.gva.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gvsig_internacional
>
>   

-- 

	*Wolfgang Qual

* *Referat für Gesundheit und Umwelt*
Umweltschutz
Umweltvorsorge
RGU-UW 11

Bayerstraße 28a
80335 München

Telefon +49 - 89 - 233 - 4 77 17
Telefax +49 - 89 - 233 - 4 77 05

http://www.muenchen.de/umweltatlas
uw11.rgu at muenchen.de
Bitte beachten Sie die Hinweise zur elektronischen
Kommunikation mit der Landeshauptstadt München:
http://www.muenchen.de/ekomm