[Gvsig_english] WFS in gvSIG 1.9

[Wolfgang Qual]

Hello Jorge,
I do not have that much experience in using WFS. My question was more a 
general one: which features should we test (for example labelling, 
digitizing, layout etc.)?

Best regards,
Wolfgang

---8<------


Am Dienstag 24 März 2009 08:13:48 schrieb Jorge Piera:
> The build number is the latest (1228). Maybe is a little bit early to
> start an intensive test of WFS, but the instructions to test it are:
>
> - Trying to load different WFS services with different types of data and
> check if gvSIG is able to load the GML's.
> - Check both spatial and alphanumerical data are loaded.
> - If you have a problem with one server and a layer, send us the URL and
> the name of the layer that you are not able to load.
>
> One of the main problem of the WFS is the lack of servers to make the
> tests.
>
> Best Regards.
>
> Jorge
>
> > Hi Jorge and all others,
> > should we download the latest build and start more intensive testing?
> > The last information I remeber was that it would only make sense to test
> > symbology and labelling. If you can give us some instructions on
> > what-should-be tested, we could propably intensify our testing
> > activities. I guess quite some users are willing to do so :)
> >
> > Best,
> > Wolfgang
> >
> > Am Montag, den 23.03.2009, 17:05 +0100 schrieb Jorge Piera:
> >> Hello Sven.
> >>
> >> The GML and WFS driver of gvSIG was integrated last week in gvSIG 1.9
> >> and now is under testing. I'm completely sure that there are mistakes
> >> and we are working on these. Please, if you found more errors would be
> >> fantastic that you send them to us.
> >>
> >> Regards.
> >>
> >> Jorge.
> >>
> >> Sven Böhme wrote:
> >>> Hi List,
> >>>
> >>> I´m testing an own WFS Server. We try to build it using the OGC
> >>> standards. The WFS (1.0.0) works fine with gvSIG 1.1.2, but not with
> >>> 1.9. I can choose the featureType with the correct attributes and
> >>> geometrytype, but get no result. Only a message, that the WFS couldn´t
> >>> be load.
> >>> Are there differences between the versions of gvSIG?
> >>>
> >>> In the attachment you can find the results of the differnt requests.
> >>> maybe there´s the problem...
> >>>
> >>> Thanks in advance,
> >>> Sven
> >>>
> >>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>-
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Gvsig_internacional mailing list
> >>> Gvsig_internacional at runas.cap.gva.es
> >>> http://runas.cap.gva.es/mailman/listinfo/gvsig_internacional
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Gvsig_internacional mailing list
> >> Gvsig_internacional at runas.cap.gva.es
> >> http://runas.cap.gva.es/mailman/listinfo/gvsig_internacional
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gvsig_internacional mailing list
> > Gvsig_internacional at runas.cap.gva.es
> > http://runas.cap.gva.es/mailman/listinfo/gvsig_internacional