[Gvsig_english] gvSIG 1.9/2.0 please add mapserver publish extension! Please add your comments!

[topi77]

Hello.

I completely agree with Wolfgang! 
The publishing extension is a really nice and important feature for gvSIG. I
think that is becoming even more important for a lot of users publishing/
offering part of there geodata as a service for the web.

And i also agree with Wolfgang, better leaving this extension as it is with
'less' symbology and correcting a few errors creating the mapfile. I can
imagine implementing the hole symbologyoptions from gvSIG 1.9 for Mapserver
is really hard.

How i can contribute is that i compared the output mapfile with an conform
mapfile and made a list with a few things that must be corrected.


Greetings,
Toni

----------------------------------

Aufwind durch Wissen!

Qualifizierte OpenSource-Schulungen
bei der www.foss-academy.eu

---------------------------------- 

Toni Pignataro
B.- Sc. Cartography and Geomatics
- Anwendungsentwickler und Projektmanager -

WhereGroup GmbH & Co. KG

Siemensstraße 8
53121 Bonn
Germany

Fon: +49 (0)228 / 90 90 38 - 20
Fax: +49 (0)228 / 90 90 38 - 11

info at wheregroup.com
www.wheregroup.com
Amtsgericht Bonn, HRA 6788
-------------------------------
Komplementärin:
WhereGroup Verwaltungs GmbH
vertreten durch:
Olaf Knopp, Peter Stamm
------------------------------




Wolfgang Qual-4 wrote:
> 
> Dear users, gvSIG-team  
> I guess we're all curious about the release of the stable 1.9 and 
> especially 2.0 of gvSIG. I really hope that this moment will com true 
> very soon.
> So many new features will then be available, especially regarding 
> symbology, table functions and and... The release candidate (or call it 
> unstable version) of 1.9
> can be tested by us. Also, some extensions are already available ... 
> _except_: the publish extension.
> I really love this extension, as it allows me to create a nice mapfile 
> out of my gvSIG (1.1.2) map. And I really need this function to be 
> integrated in 1.9 and 2.0.
> I assume that I am not the only one. Therefore, I would like to start a 
> little discussion on this topic in order to find out:
> 
> * who needs this extension and
> * for what purpose
> * what should be included, what is missing
> 
> I have the feeling that the gvSIG team _would like to add this 
> extension_ to the next version of gvSIG. However, I have also the 
> feeling that they _would like to add all new_ symbology _options_ to the 
> mapfile-export.
> This is - in my opinion - not necessary. I would be very very happy, if 
> gvSIG would allow me to create a more simple mapfile with basic options 
> regarding symbology, labels and
> reliable colour definition. Not much more. A simple extension would be 
> far better than no publish extension at all. Switching from one gvSIG 
> version to another just to be able to create a mapfile is no option for 
> me at all.
> I understand that you are busy with the refactoring and stabilization. 
> But still, we should not forget this!
> Again: any comments appreciated.
> Keep on writing!
> 
> Best regards,
> Wolfgang
> -- 
> 
> 	*Wolfgang Qual
> 
> * *Referat für Gesundheit und Umwelt*
> Umweltschutz
> Umweltvorsorge
> RGU-UW 11
> 
> Bayerstraße 28a
> 80335 München
> 
> Telefon +49 - 89 - 233 - 4 77 17
> Telefax +49 - 89 - 233 - 4 77 05
> 
> http://www.muenchen.de/umweltatlas
> uw11.rgu at muenchen.de
> Bitte beachten Sie die Hinweise zur elektronischen
> Kommunikation mit der Landeshauptstadt München:
> http://www.muenchen.de/ekomm
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gvsig_internacional mailing list
> Gvsig_internacional at listserv.gva.es
> http://listserv.gva.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gvsig_internacional
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/gvSIG-1-9-2-0-please-add-mapserver-publish-extension-Please-add-your-comments-tp3533161p3768920.html
Sent from the gvSIG international mailing list archive at Nabble.com.