[Gvsig_english] gvSIG 1.9 patch for managing measured 3D Polylines of Shapefiles

[Francisco José Peñarrubia]

Hi Alberto.

About porting, it depends on the extension, of course, but the answer is 
YES, with a bit of work. I haven't seen the code, but I suppose you will 
need to change things like exceptions, and the geometry model is 
different in 2.0, so.... migrating one extension from 1.9 to 2.0 is more 
work than from 1.1.2 to 1.9, for example. Also, FeatureIterators are 
changed, and the whole model of accesing data, among other things.

In the other hand, windows and user interface may suffer little changes.

Anyway, there are people in this list than can answer better than me 
about that. Maybe they can correct me if I am wrong.

About documentation, this is the only docs I know by now:

http://www.gvsig.org/web/docdev/gvsig_desktop_2_0/

but I'm pretty sure you already know.

Best regards, and good luck!!!.

Fran.

Alberto Perli escribió:
> Hi Francisco, we have seen in Valencia, talking about the italian project on
> extending gvSig with Z&M coordinates. 
> Flavio's patch is developed in this project, so, talking with our team but
> in particular with customers, there is the hope to see the patch in 1.9.1
> release, but in 2.0 too!
> In fact we are working on a new extension on 1.9 release (the extension will
> be ready at the end of April), and the big question is:
> The extension we are developing on 1.9, could be ported in 2.0? If not,
> there will be some specification or guidelines to easily migrate the
> extension from 1.9 to 2.0 model?
> Thanks,
> Alberto
>
>