[Gvsig_english] Gvsig_internacional Digest, Vol 89, Issue 10

[Daniel Vicente Batista]

Dear Wolfgang and all,I've been reading these messages from Wolfgang, about
translation of GVSIG, and all manuals and presentations. I am using gvsig
about three years, and I think I can help with translations to english, if
anyone wants it. And about version 2.0, I believe the website is quite
clear about issues involving migration and all the functionalities, that
will be solved and included with updates. About the translations, I think
it need to be verified by gvsig team, to be published in website, to all
users. Hope Ia can help...


2013/6/15 <gvsig_internacional-request at listserv.gva.es>

> Send Gvsig_internacional mailing list submissions to
>         gvsig_internacional at listserv.gva.es
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>
> http://listserv.gva.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gvsig_internacional
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         gvsig_internacional-request at listserv.gva.es
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         gvsig_internacional-owner at listserv.gva.es
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Gvsig_internacional digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: Feedback gvSIG 2.0.0.2066 -- Stable or Beta? (Wolfgang Qual)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 05:47:28 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Wolfgang Qual <Wolfgang.Qual at gmx.net>
> Subject: Re: [Gvsig_english] Feedback gvSIG 2.0.0.2066 -- Stable or
>         Beta?
> To: gvsig_internacional at listserv.gva.es
> Message-ID: <1371214048658-5060187.post at n6.nabble.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Dear all,
>
> I share the opinion of Simon. The title "final version" is misleading and
> causes quite some confusion if not frustration. I am using gvSIG since 2007
> and I was told so many times that many things will be solved in the new
> version of gvSIG. A "final" version should not have fundamental issues like
> those Simon has described. And I would like to mention that it is a bit
> strange that Simon's message was not answered by anyone of the gvSIG-team.
> There should be some reaction showing that "the team" cares about this
> issue.
>
> Further explanation and more clear information about the release of a true
> "final" (=stable) version would be very helpful. In my opinion it would be
> very sad if the project would lose credibility because of these things.
>
> Best regards,
> Wolfgang
>
> ps: I just read this sentence on gvsig.org: "The main differences between
> gvSIG 1.x and 2.x versions are explained at the webinar given in May 7th
> 2013, and at the presentation given at the 7th International gvSIG
> Conference (both in Spanish at the moment)." - not very helpful for the
> non-english speaking community... ;(
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Feedback-gvSIG-2-0-0-2066-Stable-or-Beta-tp5059250p5060187.html
> Sent from the gvSIG users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gvsig_internacional mailing list
> Gvsig_internacional at listserv.gva.es
> http://listserv.gva.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gvsig_internacional
>
>
> End of Gvsig_internacional Digest, Vol 89, Issue 10
> ***************************************************
>



-- 

Daniel Vicente Batista
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://listserv.gva.es/pipermail/gvsig_internacional/attachments/20130615/dc8d37ba/attachment.htm